Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1109

reference
959-tree-1
name
1109
tree-preservation-order

undefined

959-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.020219 50.876852)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.020177 50.876847,-1.020179 50.876856,-1.020185 50.876863,-1.020194 50.876869,-1.020206 50.876873,-1.020219 50.876875,-1.020244 50.876870,-1.020254 50.876864,-1.020260 50.876856,-1.020262 50.876848,-1.020260 50.876840,-1.020254 50.876832,-1.020245 50.876826,-1.020233 50.876822,-1.020220 50.876821,-1.020207 50.876822,-1.020195 50.876826,-1.020185 50.876832,-1.020179 50.876839,-1.020177 50.876847)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL